| |||||||||
FEBRUARY 2000 | VOL. 4, NO. 2 FEATURE
LAST MONTH
|
LAURA MACCABEE
The American release of Jane Campion's Holy Smoke amidst
the public's tug-of-war over the fate of Elian Gonzalez is fitting: the
film begins with the decision of a young woman, Ruth (Kate Winslet), to
forsake her Australian upbringing and remain in New Delhi, India, where
she has sought and found truth through a guru. Her family in Sydney
devise a plan by which the mother flies to India, finds her daughter,
feigns the coming death of her husband and entreats her daughter to
return home. Ruth is none too eager to leave her newfound freedom, especially
when confronted with the next phase of the family's plotting. They have
flown in PJ (Harvey Keitel), American cult-exiter extraordinaire, to
spend three full days removing all traces of Ruth's recent experiences.
And thus she finds the privacy of her own spiritual persuasions
exploited. She is prohibited to exercise any authority over her own
life, and this includes the ability to choose her own environs. The film
is an exploration of possession, specifically the ownership of one's
children, one's mind, one's body. Ruth's dependence on her faith is
destroyed and briefly replaced by the presence of the man who is
supposed to fix her. But this soon shifts and Ruth assumes control of
an acquiescent PJ. Such an easily phased man provides an interesting
extension of Keitel's all-too-familiar character of the "fix-it guy"
from Pulp Fiction. Here, Ruth's power deprives him not only of
his initially detached, authoritative position as cult-exiter, but also
of his pants; He spends much of the film prancing about the outback in
red lipstick and a matching dress, vaguely reminiscent of Priscilla,
Queen Of The Desert. Such blurred gender lines are signature to Australian film making,
but Campion also succeeds at entwining physical geography and spiritual
enlightenment; ancient dance and modern, Western music; the traditional
Indian Sari dress and the newer, German Berkenstock sandal. Clothes in
this film, as anywhere, become defining labels of people, beliefs and
cultures, and loss of clothing allows both Ruth and PJ to reevaluate
their bodies as reflections of their minds. Campion's premise is strong, but she offers no instruction, no play
of morals, no distinction of right and wrong. Instead, her resolutions
are circumstantial and comical. To her credit she has avoided the
distinctions of good and evil; there are no winners at the end, and
Ruth's battle is within herself. The film's first half is engaging and
involved, and includes some gorgeous shots of India. Campion dares to
raise certain unanswerable questions. But that is the rub and that is
why the film loses momentum. There are no answers. What begins as a
beautiful and stirring quest of the mind becomes a ridiculous jaunt
through the country. The intrigue halts, the humor dries up, and then
there is only frustration. LAURA MACCABEE is a contributing writer to Renaissance Online Magazine.
PICTURE copyright © 1999 Miramax Pictures.
| ||||||||
![]() | |||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
Full Issue Contents | FEEDBACK | Questionnaire | Archive | Free Subscription |