![]() | ||||
| ||||
JANUARY 2000
| FEATURES
ALSO THIS MONTH
LAST MONTH
|
![]()
LAURA DAVE
It seems that a theme among this year's Hollywood holiday films is
to market themselves in a reality completely unlike the one they offer
up on the screen. From Girl Interrupted, the Ryder/Jolie
spectacle which is marketed as a funny jaunt into a mental hospital in
the late 60's, but in reality is a soupy television movie adaptation of
the striking memoir by the same name, to The Talented Mr. Ripley,
which is marketed as a suspense drama, but offers no suspense I could
see, there is little to no truth to the advertising campaigns. Particularly considering the hype surrounding The Talented Mr.
Ripley, I still have trouble believing this is the same
thought-provoking material that originally surfaced in Patricia
Highsmith's fictional creations. This "adapted" world that Anthony
Minghella has created more closely resembles fragments on the cutting
room floor of The English Patient --another of his overindulged
contributions to the American cinematography. While the two films focus
on much different concepts, they drum up the same unauthentic feel,
leaving any character-driven psychological depth to the viewers' own
imaginations. In both pictures, the majority of the attention is fixed
on the gorgeous scenery--which, to commend Minghella, is captured
brilliantly--and far too little attention to digging up what's lurking
beneath it. Viewers are left swirling in the wind that sits on the
screen for ten minutes too long. In Ripley, Minghella invites us to view the world of Dickie
Greenleaf and Marge Sherwood--played by the gorgeous Jude Law
(Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil) and Gweneth Paltrow
(Shakespeare In Love)--a world upon which Tom Ripley (Matt Damon)
trespasses and destroys. The viewer knows, from the story's inception,
that this destruction is inevitable: the only suspense here is how long
it takes for the destruction to begin. It is a good hour before Ripley
strikes and the movie actually sees some motion. From this point on, the
movie has the potential to look further into Ripley's twisted demise,
but unfortunately, it does nothing of the sort. Instead, Ripley races
around Italy like any other criminal running from his crimes. Minghella does manage to throw in some interesting supporting
characters to the mix including the truly talented Philip Seymour
Hoffman (Boogie Nights, Patch Adams), who also shines in another
holiday blockbuster, Magnolia. Hoffman breathes life into every
scene he enters as does the subtlety intriguing Cate Blanchett
(Elizabeth). A very interesting trio for the main three would
have been combining Law with Hoffman as Ripley, and Blanchett as his
Marge. This would eliminate the Damon problem: an actor too polished
and sure of himself to carry off Ripley, although he does invest his
whole self in the role and reaches greater depths than he has in his
previous work. Not to mention the Paltrow predicament: she resembles the
self she offers on talk shows and articles, possibly suggesting she is
too damn tired from working so much this year to dig beyond the real
Gweneth. This film definitely needed to do something to help it from its
tired, slow moving agenda. I found myself as disconnected from Tom
Ripley at the end as I did at the beginning. And I barely cared whether
he killed anyone else or was killed himself. As long as I didn't have to
watch anymore, I was ready to applaud for the one who came out on top.
LAURA DAVE , a free-lance writer living in New York City, writes both poetry and articles on popular culture for several publications. She is a staff entertainment writer.
PICTURE copyright © 1999 Miramax Pictures.
|
|||
![]() |
||||
Full Issue Contents | FEEDBACK | Questionnaire | Archive | Free Subscription |